
Orthogonal review and the Yalc Framework
Useful as a skill marketplace for capabilities Yalc doesn't ship natively. Treat it as supplementary infrastructure, not a replacement for Yalc's own GTM specific skills.
Orthogonal, plainly
Orthogonal is positioning itself as a layer of "trusted skills and APIs" for AI agents. The product surface is intentionally minimal in public messaging: building blocks, integrations, agent compatibility. The 40 plus partner integrations span scraping (ScrapeGraph), prospecting, and other categories.
For Yalc workflows, Orthogonal is a complementary skill source. Where Yalc ships skills purpose built for GTM (Crustdata MCP, Unipile outreach, Notion CRM), Orthogonal can supply general purpose infrastructure (web scraping primitives, document parsing, niche API wrappers) that Yalc doesn't need to build in house.
Position in the GTM operating system
Orthogonal sits at the **intake** node when you need a capability Yalc doesn't ship natively (specialized scraping, document parsing, a vendor not in the Yalc skill registry). Most Yalc workflows won't touch Orthogonal directly. The ones that do treat it as a fallback source for niche capabilities.
Deploying Orthogonal inside a Yalc workflow
Workflow position
Supplementary skill source. Yalc invokes an Orthogonal skill when none of its native skills (Crustdata, Unipile, FullEnrich, Firecrawl) cover the specific capability needed. The output flows back into the standard Yalc pipeline.
Prompt patterns
Copy paste prompts for Claude Code that invoke Orthogonal.
Chaining recommendations
Anti patterns to avoid
Yalc skill availability
No first party Yalc skill wraps Orthogonal directly. Yalc invokes Orthogonal skills via the same Claude Code skill protocol Orthogonal uses publicly. Integration is by convention, not by custom code.
→ Request a Yalc skill for this toolPros, cons, who it's for
Pros
- 40 plus integrations available out of the box
- Works inside Claude Code, Cursor, OpenClaw, Codex (multi agent surface)
- Y Combinator backed, active product, fast iteration
- Useful for capabilities outside Yalc's GTM core (general scraping, document parsing)
Cons
- Public docs are sparse. You'll need to talk to the team to understand the surface.
- Pricing not public. Procurement friction for solo operators.
- Overlaps with Yalc's native skills in some areas. Decide which is canonical for your workflows.
- Less GTM specific than Yalc itself.
Who it's for
- GTM teams who already use Yalc or another orchestration layer and need supplementary skill primitives
- Engineers building agent workflows who want a skill marketplace alongside custom code
- Operators who want to pilot agent infrastructure without committing to a single vendor
What you'll really spend
Orthogonal pricing is not public on the homepage. The product is positioned as infrastructure for AI agents, with 40 plus partner integrations and skills available across Claude Code, Cursor, OpenClaw, and Codex. Pricing is likely per skill consumption or per agent seat. Talk to the team for current rates.
The interesting angle for Yalc is that Orthogonal and Yalc share the same surface (Claude Code) and overlap in some skill primitives. Orthogonal provides composable capability bricks. Yalc provides the GTM operating system that orchestrates them.
Free / waitlist
Some skills available to evaluate. Sign up for early access.
Team
Pricing scaled to skill consumption and seats. Talk to sales.
Enterprise
Dedicated infra, SLA, custom skill development. For large GTM teams.
Tools to consider instead
Where Orthogonal appears in Yalc stacks
Frequently asked
Is Orthogonal a competitor to Yalc?
They overlap on surface (Claude Code) but solve different problems. Yalc is a GTM operating system with opinionated workflows for prospecting, outreach, content, and intelligence. Orthogonal is a skill marketplace for general purpose agent capabilities. They compose rather than compete.
When should I use Orthogonal instead of writing a Yalc skill?
When the capability is generic (scraping, document parsing, niche API wrapping) and not GTM specific. For prospecting, enrichment, outreach, CRM writeback, Yalc's native skills are deeper.
How much does Orthogonal cost?
Not public. Pricing scales with skill consumption and seats. Best to talk to the team.
Does Orthogonal work with Claude Code?
Yes. The product explicitly supports Claude Code, Cursor, OpenClaw, and Codex.
Can I use Orthogonal without Yalc?
Yes. Orthogonal is independent infrastructure. Yalc is one of many possible orchestration layers on top.
Is there a free tier?
Some skills are available to evaluate. Full pricing requires a sales conversation.
No first party Yalc skill yet. Open an issue and we'll prioritize.
Or fork the repo and contribute one.